Faculty & Staff Resources

• Class Enrollment Summary
• Major Minor Roster
• My Advisees Not Currently Enrolled
• My Advisees Registration Holds
• Student Specific Permission Numbers
• Transfer Course Evaluation APAS
• Transferology.com Replacement Course

There must be an Affiliation Agreement signed and on file with every school or other agency in which students are placed for practicum, student teaching, or internships. The following contract templates have been approved by Office of General Counsel.

CEHSP Affiliation Agreement

AHS Affiliation Agreement

Procedures:

1. Download the appropriate Affiliation Agreement file. Prepare the contract and submit electronically to the Associate Dean with dated signatures from the Department and the affiliated agency. 
2. The Associate Dean or Dean will sign on behalf of the College.
3. The EVCAA has authority to sign on behalf of the Board of Regents. The College will forward the agreement to the EVCAA and obtain their signature. Agreements are sent once per week- on Friday afternoons - to the EVCAA unless there is an exceptional circumstance.
4. Signed documents will be forwarded to the department. The Department is responsible for sending a signed copy to the affiliated agency.
5. An electronic copy will be maintained on file by the Dean´s Office for the duration of the contract.

See also: Background Checks; Insurance, Certificate of

For Student Field Placement (safety of minors)

Fax your Background Check Request Cover Sheet for student field placement to 218-726-7631. Check out this Google Doc for detailed information regarding the background check process. Contact Rhonda Lemon at 218-726-7665 with any questions about this process.

For Employment

Background checks for student, Civil Service, labor represented, faculty and Professional & Academic positions need to complete the UMD Background Check Request Cover Sheet and email [email protected], or fax to x7505.

• Bohannon Hall BEP
• Chester Park BERG
• Education Endazhi-gikinoo'amaading BERG
• Sports and Health Center BERG

Consistent with Minnesota State law, at their December 2005 meeting, the Board of Regents approved a resolution authorizing the University of Minnesota to schedule classes and events on caucus night. This resolution also permitted individual accommodation for students who wished to attend their party caucus.

Caucuses are held on the first Tuesday evening of March. All classes and events scheduled for this night will be held as scheduled with the expectation that instructors will make reasonable accommodations for students desiring to attend a caucus.

If a faculty or staff member scheduled to teach on Tuesday night wants to attend their party caucus or if enough of their students indicate that they will be attending caucus so that holding class becomes impractical, instructors may either cancel class or make reasonable alternative arrangements.

The Dean and the Department of Education has priority for use of the room and will schedule regular administrative meetings for an entire academic year. Other faculty, staff, departments and committees may schedule the room as needed.
Calendar of meetings will be posted each week. Call Support Staff at 7233 from the Department of Education to make reservations. If your meeting is cancelled, contact Support Staff also.
Reservations should be made no more than one month in advance. Meetings should be limited to three hours. Students may hold meetings, but it must be scheduled by a faculty advisor or instructor. Meetings that will end after 4:30 p.m. must have a faculty supervisor present who will be responsible for the room.
The person scheduling the room is responsible for the following at the end of the meeting:

• Trash and food have been removed
• Lights are turned off
• Door is shut and locked
• Chairs/room is put back in order
• Support Staff will check the room every morning. If it is out of order, she will report that information to the Department Head

Any person or group may be refused use of the room if these guidelines are consistently ignored.
EduE 142 will comfortably seat up to 20 participants. The Conference room has audio visual equipment, white board, video conferencing equipment, and bulletin hanging strips. The Conference room contains a small sink. There is no access to photocopying or office supplies.

The Department Head is responsible for assuring that:

• appropriate contracts are in place with agencies in which students are present for any clinical experience associated with academic programs;
• that students are aware of the agreement in place with the school or agency; and
• that policies on background checks are enforced by all programs in the department. 

All courses and credit-bearing experience that requires a field placement, practicum, internship, externship, or student teaching component in a non-University of Minnesota setting must have a current. approved affiliation agreement, and comply with background check policies.

Internship Policies

These policies outline minimum expectations for student time and site visitation.

1. An Internship Manual, or a required prerequisite course, that outlines policies and procedures pertinent to the program sponsoring the internship.  The Manual or course syllabus must include reference to the policy on background checks (under development), and should advise students of background check requirements for licensure in the relevant field.
2. The program should outline the responsibilities of site supervisors and have quality control processes in place.  
3. Consistent and frequent contact between the instructor, the site supervisor and the student should take place over the course of the semester as appropriate for the program sponsoring an internship. This may include site visits, phone calls, email or other electronic communication.
4. Students should document a minimum of 40 hours per credit (amount of time may vary by program) through the semester.
5. Students should be required to document activity using various techniques including weekly time logs, journals, assignments, and/or final projects that assess learning outcomes.
6. An Affiliation Agreement must be signed with the agency BEFORE an internship begins. Agreements from sites that require their own contract must be approved by Office of General Council before they can be executed. The contract is signed by the Executive Vice Chancellor - Academic Affairs and Dean or Associate Dean of the College as per Delegation of Authority guidelines and filed in the Dean's Office. Any addendum to a contract proposed by an affiliate has to be approved by general counsel.
   • Signed contracts may be for up to five years.
   • When an individual placement is made, a letter confirming the placement with begin and ends dates should be on file in the department or with the internship supervisor.
7. No retroactive credit will be awarded for what a student may perceive to be internship activity in an outside agency.
8. Programs should be asked to review implementation of these policies regularly on request of the Associate Dean.

All CEHSP employees are obliged to follow UM Office of General Counsel regulations with regard to contracts. Guidelines are spelled out on the OGC Contracts page.

Internal Procedures are as follows:

1. Prepare the contract and make enough copies so that there can be originals mailed for signatures to each individual involved in the contract. Submit copies, with appropriate signatures and envelopes prepared for mailing, to the Dean's Office.
2. The contract is submitted to the Dean's Office with notation of any required clearance of Subject Matter Expert approval.
3. The Administrative Manager will review to determine that
   • A standard contract* has been used with no changes made
   • There is no missing information; and
   • Subject matter signature authority has been attached as needed.
4. The contract will be logged for Dean´s signature.
5. Where the Dean has authority signature,
   • Signed documents will be forwarded to all parties.
   • One original will be maintained on file in the Dean's Office for the duration of the contract.
6. If the Dean does not have authority signature, it will be forwarded to the appropriate UMD personnel for next signature.

Procedure for Issuance of Contract Letters of Appointment (Academic)

1. Departments draft the letter using the required 100% contract letter template or the temp/casual letter template for less than 100% time appointments. Use the multi-year contract template for faculty on multi-year contracts.
2. Letter is sent via email to Administrative Manager to clear workload and budget and to check for bargaining contract language, administrative policy adherence, and salary computations.
3. Letter, signed by Dean, is returned to the department for employee signatures.
4. Signed contract is secured to pay documents and forwarded to Administrative Manager for processing.

All contracts issued for instruction of CEHSP courses are to be issued by the Dean.

Once curriculum proposals are approved by the Dean's Office, proposals are submitted to the EVCAA's office where they are forwarded to the next step (e.g., liberal education, UMD Graduate Council, Twin Cities Regents etc.).

All proposals must be submitted to Lynn Velander electronically by the department head or the DGS at least one week prior to the date of the appropriate curriculum meeting. All submitted proposals must be reviewed and approved by the department head and must contain his/her electronic signature (see #4 below). Refer to Academic Affairs Council or Graduate Program Council for scheduled meeting dates.

Course Proposals

A course proposal is initiated by a regular faculty member.  Discuss with your Department Head and program members your plan for the proposed course to determine whether the plan is feasible. Choose the template from the UMD Curriculum Process page that reflects the type of proposal to be developed. Carefully follow the instructions on the form and in the linked pages, and forward as indicated in these steps.

1. Choose a template, complete all parts, and save the file using a descriptive file name, e.g., eled_1010_change, hper_3000_add, etc.
2. Review all URL links in the form to make sure you conform to University policies.
3. Submit the proposal to the department curriculum committee. After final editing and approval by the department curriculum committee, send the electronic proposal file to the Department Head for review and approval via email.
4. Once the Department Head has reviewed and approved the proposal, the Department Head enters x.500 login and name (e.g., jsmith—John Smith) in the signature box. If the proposal is for a Graduate School course, the Department Head will forward the proposal to the program DGS for electronic signature.
5. The department head or DGS forwards the proposal file to Lynn Velander via email. 

IMPORTANT:  The file must be received by the Dean's Office one week prior to a scheduled curriculum meeting so that the CEHSP curriculum committee members have time to consider the proposal.

Curriculum Committee Consideration

Proposals will be circulated to the appropriate CEHSP curriculum committee.  Curriculum committee members are encouraged to use the review form will consider the following questions in their review.

• What is the rationale for the proposal?
• Is the level of the proposed course appropriate?
• Are the outcomes stated in measurable terms?
• Do the evaluation methods address the stated outcomes?
• Is the conceptual outline congruent with student outcomes?
• Does any duplication across programs result?
• Is the proposal congruent with the objectives of the program/department?
• Does the proposal conform to relevant University policies?
• Are all required sections of the document completed?

**Example

The proposal should include sufficient information to answer these questions.  In addition, the department representative on the curriculum committee should be well versed about the proposal, and/or the faculty sponsor of the proposal should plan to attend the CEHSP curriculum committee meeting in which the proposal will be considered.

Where (which curriculum committee) are course proposals submitted?

Changes to Programs

A program change can be initiated by a regular faculty member. It must be approved with the home department and submitted to the college by the Department Head with their approval.  Discuss with your Department Head and program members your plan for the proposed program change to determine whether the plan is feasible.

• Updates to programs should be outlined in memo format and submitted via email by the Department Head to the Associate Dean and Lynn Velander in the Dean's Office.

Any variation on delivery of existing programs should be outlined in memo format and submitted to Lynn Velander. The memo should include rationale and explanation of how the content and mission of the program are being effectively delivered in the adaptation. Any exceptions to GPC approved policies necessary for the adapted program should be outlined for approval by GPC. Note: all online course proposals or course changes must also submit an online delivery addendum in addition to a course proposal or course change memo.

Proposals for New Programs

A program proposal is initiated by a regular faculty member. Discuss with your Department Head and program members your plan for the proposed program to determine whether the plan is feasible. The template for proposing a new program, new track or concentration, etc. is available from the UMD Curriculum Process page. Carefully follow the instructions on the form and in the linked pages, and forward as indicated in these steps.

1. Choose a template, complete all parts, and save the file using a descriptive file name, e.g., eled_1010_change, ahs_3000_add, etc.
2. Review all URL links in the form to make sure you conform to University policies.
3. Submit the proposal to the department curriculum committee. After final editing and approval by the department curriculum committee, send the electronic proposal file to the Department Head for review and approval via email.
4. Once the Department Head has reviewed and approved the proposal, the Department Head enters x.500 login and name (e.g., jsmith—John Smith) in the signature box. If the proposal is for a Graduate School program, the Department Head will forward the proposal to the program DGS for electronic signature.
5. The department head or DGS forwards the proposal file to Lynn Velander via email.

IMPORTANT: The file must be received by the Dean's Office one week prior to a scheduled curriculum meeting so that the CEHSP curriculum committee members have time to consider the proposal.

• Proposals for undergraduate programs, minors and concentrations or specializations are reviewed by Academic Affairs Council, with a recommendation for approval/disapproval forwarded to the Dean of the College.
• Proposals for graduate programs or specializations are reviewed by Graduate Program Council, with a recommendation for approval/disapproval forwarded to the Dean of the College.

Link to Delegation of Authority Home Page

To find information specific for CEHSP:

• Click on DELEGATIONS SEARCH
• List Delegator (e.g. jppastra) and Delegatee (e.g. fmaas) results in a list of all items delegated to the Delegatee.

Course Schedule Preparation

Department staff enter all schedule data directly to the Electronic Course Scheduling (ECS) system which is then uploaded to PeopleSoft. A year's schedule is "rolled forward" to the next academic year. Departments are typically advised to update fall schedules in early December, and spring schedules in mid-January. The Dean's Office will provide an electronic dump of current schedule data to assist in schedule preparation.

Department staff will review each record. If the section is to be offered again, all data elements will be checked and updated. Specifically:

• Any section that will not be offered the next year should be deleted (including section 090 courses in CE).
• Time, date, room, and instructor should be checked and updated for any section that will be offered the next year (including section 090 courses in CE).
• Adjunct instructor names should be removed from all sections.
• Enter contact minutes; contact minutes are 50 minutes per unit for the course, except when controlled by a special workload protocol (see below).
• Contact minutes for any section of an individualized registration course that has an approved workload protocol should be set to zero (e.g., student teaching, independent study, practicum, etc.).
• On sections that meet at different times on different days, or are held in more than one room, split the contact minutes between the times/rooms.

Workload Reports

Faculty workload reports are generated from the data warehouse. Instructional workload will be calculated from contact minutes entered in PeopleSoft. Deadlines will be announced for verification of contact minutes prior to generating official workload or course inventory reports.

When a course is covered by an approved protocol, department staff calculate contact minutes for entry to the instructor panel in an amount that interprets the approved protocol.In order to calculate contact minutes, determine the workload contact hour based on enrollment and multiply by 50. Examples follow.

• CSD 8097. Students enroll in one section with multiple instructors. Contact minutes are based on one contact hour per client assigned to students. Example: Faculty member supervises a student with 2 clients = 2 CH = 100 minutes.
• Lecture/lab combination, assign actual contact to each portion of the class. Example: PSY 3021 LEC section meets 3 days a week and gets 150 contact minutes; LAB meets 1 day a week for 50 contact minutes.
• Student Teaching. Supervision of a local student teacher carries 0.67 CH. Example: faculty member supervises 4 student teachers, calculation is 4 x 0.67 x 50 = 134 contact minutes.
• Independent study. CEHSP protocol is 0.2 CH per SCH. Example: Faculty has 2 students in Educ 5991, one registered for 2 credits and another registered for 3 credits. Total SCH = 5 x 0.2 x 50 = 50 contact minutes. (NOTE: There should be a separate class section of independent study courses for each faculty member.)
• Internships carry 0.25 CH per student registered. Faculty member has 5 students registered in HLTH 4996. 5 x 0.25 x 50 = 62.5 contact minutes.

Internal (non-negotiated) protocol information is tracked by department staff and prints at the bottom of workload reports.

Workload reports are available for review at any time.There are three different versions of the reports as follows:

• WORKLOAD PROJECTED report should be printed and reviewed with faculty during spring semester prior to the first day of the registration queue for the subsequent fall semester.The report uses section enrollment cap for fall and spring to calculate student credit hours. Any workload capacity that might be used for special assignment, field supervision, etc. should be noted in the release/overload box at the bottom of the workload report. Data for this section can be entered at the department level or sent to Lynn Velander.
• WORKLOAD MIDYEAR report should be printed and reviewed during fall semester prior to the first day of the registration queue for the following spring semester to check for any potential overload situations. The report uses actual enrollments for fall and section enrollment caps for spring to calculate student credit hours.
• WORKLOAD FINAL report will be printed for retention in Dean´s Office anytime after the end of the second week of classes in the spring semester. Report is based on actual enrollments for both terms, plus faculty table updated with all release, overload, and UROP awards.

Course Inventory Reports

Course inventory reports will be printed and submitted by the Associate Dean using contact minute information that has been verified at the Department level. Deadlines for verification will be announced.

CEHSP Checklist and Procedures for Multi-Year Appointment Applications

CEHSP term faculty who have at least five (5) years of service at the University are welcome to submit applications to be considered for 2-year or 3-year term appointments (i.e., multi-year appointments). Please note the following: a) having a previous multi-year appointment does not guarantee receipt of a future multi-year appointment; b) faculty with a multi-year appointment set to expire at the end of the current academic year must go through this application process to be considered for another multi-year appointment; and c) if an application for a multi-year appointment is denied or the decision about a multi-year appointment is deferred to the next appointment year, a 1-year appointment may still be offered.

This checklist and procedure are in accordance with Section 201.302 of the Collective Bargaining Agreement between the Regents of the University of Minnesota and University Education Association.

1. To submit an application, the faculty member must submit the following items to their department head on or before October 15 *in 2021, the deadline was extended to October 22:
   • a letter of recommendation from the department head identifying how the faculty member meets the eligibility criteria for a multi-year appointment
   • current curriculum vitae
   • a cover letter (one-page maximum) describing their current position description, including courses taught, typical advising load, and service to the department/college/campus
   • the five (5) most recent merit evaluations (i.e., department head’s signed recommendation and verification form)
2. The department head must submit the following to the Dean on or before October 31:
   • all the materials submitted by the faculty member (as noted above)
   • any information about enrollment, programmatic need, and student demand relevant to the faculty member’s application
3. The Dean will review all the application materials submitted, enrollment for the last three years, and workload for the last five years of all faculty who applied for a multi-year appointment. Multi-year appointments will be awarded based upon a college-wide assessment of needs and budgetary considerations.

PDF version of the Multi-Year Appointment Application checklist

Procedures:

All international faculty who are interested in spending a semester or a year as a visiting scholar must adhere to the following timeline:

Application submitted by Oct 1 of year previous to planned stay (For scholars planning a visit beginning Fall semester). Notifications of acceptance will be shared by December 1^st, of the year previous to planned stay. Letter of invitation will be sent to the faculty awarded visiting status at this time.

Application submitted by Feb 1 of year previous to planned stay (For scholars planning a visit beginning Spring semester). Notification of acceptance will be communicated by April 1^st of the year previous to planned stay.

Final acceptance of the visiting scholar is dependent on completing the application process as well as securing all necessary documentation required by US immigration services as well as home country requirements.

Initial contact with the prospective visiting scholar shall come from either individual faculty or via the International Education Office. 

Department contact and Dean will review applications

International Education Office will be notified of all pending and potential scholars considered for UMD residency.

As a general rule, office space will be allocated based on seniority within rank:

• Tenured
• Tenure-track
• Multi-year contract
• 1-year contract renewed multi-year
• 1-year contract for purpose of replacement
• 75% time
• Part-time

Recognized functionality issues may supersede, and final authority to assign offices resides with the Dean.
Offices of faculty on sabbatical or any type of leave of absence may be used by replacement faculty when necessitated by space limitations.
For additional guidelines on space allocation, refer to the Academic Space Allocation Guidelines on the Academic Affairs website.

The procedure outlined follows section 250.510 of the UEA contract. Human Resources Policies and Procedures Unit 9 (UEA) University Education Association Contract

Scheduling relates to workload assignment. By contract the Principal Administrator has the actual responsibility for workload assignment. Since assignments and schedules are best developed at the department level, as indicated in the contract, the CEHSP Dean has delegated that duty to the Department Heads. The Associate Dean has been assigned to match workload assignment and scheduling with funding and major and minor needs. Our value is to offer courses that allow the students the chance to complete their degree in the expected time with a minimum, if any, number of bottle necks. Technically, the DH makes a recommendation to the Associate Dean, and the Dean approves the recommendation or makes changes in keeping with the responsibility of the Principal Administrator.
To accomplish scheduling and workload assignment, it is wise for department heads to consider the faculty members' expertise and listen to faculty needs and preferences. However, it will be the department head's decision how to schedule and there is no right or entitlement to get the exact scheduling preferred. It depends on major and minor needs, enrollment, and funding. Department heads are advised to consult with faculty when the need arises. There is no standard mechanism for doing so and is thus left to the department head's individual style of functioning.

• CEHSP Search Procedures (Checklist)
• Search Committee Tips and Guidelines

Reimbursement Procedures

The Dean's Office will pay for:

• Maximum of 2 people from search committee at breakfast with candidates
• Maximum of 2 people from search committee at lunch with candidates
• Maximum of 2 people from search committee at dinner with candidates
• Use the per diem rate for Duluth found on the General Services Administration website.

If you choose to purchase food from a vendor and bring to the campus or use UMD Food Service, the maximum to be reimbursed from the Dean’s Office will be at the per diem rate times a maximum of two search committee members plus the candidate.

Candidate’s travel – use the best available rates for airfare; use hotels with U of M contracts only unless a better price is obtainable else where; receipts are required for all additional allowable expenses (e.g. parking, taxi, etc.).

Internal candidates - hotel lodging will not be reimbursed for local candidates.

NOTES:
1) If departments want to spend more than what is allotted from the Dean's Office, they can pay for it from departmental funds as long as University policy and the rule of consistency is followed.
2) Submit request for expense reimbursements no later than June 15.

Short-term university study abroad programs are the fastest growing form of study abroad for US students. Short-term programs offer a number of benefits for students including flexibility, affordability, and fit given that their home institution offers the programs. Short-term programs also offer unique learning opportunities along with tremendous responsibilities for faculty. From the standpoint of the University of Minnesota, they are considered the highest student safety risk type of study abroad program.  In the spirit of offering students a rigorous academic experience as well as one that complies with University requirements, this proposal outlines a Short Term
University Study Abroad Policy for CEHSP programs. The UMD Study Abroad office developed tools such Short-Term Study Abroad Program Leader Handbook and Checklist for faculty to use and this collegiate policy expands on that information.
 

Guiding principles

1. To support existing successful short term programs
2. To encourage and support new short term programs
3. To recognize that short term programs are not substitutes for one another. In other words, students are not going to necessarily accept a program in Ireland as a substitute for a program in Peru if they really want the type of experience offered by the Peru program.
4. Academic merit, program demand, and student affordability should be considered in supporting short-term programs.

Proposing Programs

Faculty should refer to Short-Term Study Abroad Program Leader Checklist 12-24 months before program is to be offered.

The Process

All short-term programs (existing and new programs) must be “proposed” each year through the UMD Study Abroad office. A proposal cannot be submitted to Study Abroad without a course proposal approved by EVCAA. Since the Short-term Program Proposal is due on November 1st, all study abroad course proposals need to be submitted by October 1 of the previous year. A new course proposal offered under some CEHSP course number must be submitted to CEHSP Academic Affairs Committee in time to meet EVCAA deadline of Oct. 1.

Along with the course proposal to CEHSP Academic Affairs Committee, the faculty leader(s) must submit a preliminary syllabus that demonstrates acceptable academic rationale for the program, as well as a budget that includes an estimate of the minimum number of students needed in order to break-even on the program. A budget template is available at Study Abroad. In addition, the faculty leader(s) must explain why the faculty leader(s) are qualified to lead this program from both an academic and travel/intercultural perspective.

Before submitting a proposal to Study Abroad, any new short-term study abroad program must have at least one faculty leader complete the Study Abroad Short term Leader workshop. In order to facilitate planning and implementation of the program, faculty are encouraged to apply for an international travel grant through the UM Global Programs and Strategy Alliance in order to complete the background and logistical legwork for the program.
http://global.umn.edu/funding/fac_staff.html

Factors to be considered in the Proposal

Academic Component

Short-term study abroad is for credit academic programs. It needs to be clear to students that these are academic experiences, not a vacation. Academic requirements for the program should be appropriate for the level and number of credits fitted to course learning outcomes.

Faculty will develop opportunities to engage students in pre-departure learning activities and complete a variety of assignments, in addition to the minimal requirements for orientation, including examples:

• Syllabus with course objectives, outcomes, and assessments.
• Exams on course concepts, country background and culture.
• Papers on sites and organizations that will be visited in country (and that may be presented prior to visiting these sites while abroad).
• Writing personal academic goals that students will reflect upon while journaling during the program and at the end of the program.

Budgeting

The CEHSP Academic Affairs committee evaluates the academic component of the study abroad course proposal but budgeting is also an important consideration Proposing faculty should work with the Study Abroad and Dean’s offices on budgeting.

Care should be taken in designing a program that is affordable for students. Price is a major concern and leaders should plan programs that consider both safety and cost. From a risk management perspective, the University prefers that all faculty leaders stay in the same housing as students.

Honoraria or other fees to international faculty should be explicitly identified in the preliminary budget for the program. These costs should be modest compared with the principal costs of housing or UMD faculty salary on a per student basis. If these costs are excessive, it raises questions about whether the program is in fact a university program or actually an exchange program where the UMD faculty member and salary is superfluous.

Approving Programs

When it is up to CESHP to decide what programs to offer in a given year, existing short-term programs with specific course numbers (e.g., Hlth 4100, student teaching abroad, etc.) that are continuing parts of the curriculum, should be weighted more heavily in the approval and selection process, assuming that existing programs continue to meet demand, budgetary, responsible student behavior and academic outcomes.

Implementing Programs

Once EVCAA and Study Abroad have approved the program, the faculty leader(s) can commence marketing and recruitment of students for the program.

Marketing

The UMD Study Abroad program encourages faculty program leaders to share their experience, enthusiasm and expertise with students in order to promote their offerings. See Short-Term Study Abroad Program Leader Handbook for ideas on program promotion. However, no CEHSP program should be marketed to students that do not have a clear set of academic objectives, prerequisites, a proposed itinerary for the program, and a preliminary price for the program. Students must apply for study abroad programs by paying a nonrefundable application fee to the UMD Study Abroad office.

There are a number of vehicles available through Study Abroad and CEHSP for promoting study abroad programs. These include:

• Study Abroad office and website
• Flat panel displays in the CEHSP departments
• Flyers
• Posters
• UMD and CEHSP study abroad fairs
• Personal presentations
• Department and College webpages
• Social media sites

Accepting Students

While each program leader can set the criteria for accepting students into the short-term program, there are several issues that should be considered:

1. All students must disclose any academic or legal misconduct as part of the     application process. That does not mean that all do. Study Abroad program will run further background checks on admitted students and faculty may interview students as part of the application. No student should be admitted to the program that is under court jurisdiction or currently on probation at the University of Minnesota. Each leader should decide how much risk is acceptable in admitting a student with a series of misconduct incidents.  Leaders should be speaking with students about past incidents and behavioral expectations on the program.
2. Academic capabilities. Students on academic probation may not be admitted to study abroad programs. Faculty should evaluate applicants’ academic performance for evidence that they will be able to meet the course requirements.
3. All qualified applicants should be interviewed to make clear the program expectations and requirements.

Institutional home of students enrolling the course

While the primary target market for these short-term programs is CEHSP students, there is no reason that the programs need be limited to this audience. If the program is going to be open to students from other institutions (e.g., students from another US university) or other majors (e.g., UMD communications major) or even one of our students on full time internship, online majors, or otherwise outside of Duluth, then this is important to consider in designing the program. For example, how will students not on campus
complete any of the pre-departure lectures, classroom experiences, and orientation sessions? Will technology such as ITV, Skype or other appropriate means be used to bring the program to these students? If so, these costs need to be budgeted for in the program price. In the past, Study Abroad office has not let these costs be solely borne by that particular student but treated as a program cost.

Compliance

All program leaders are required to maintain compliance with all University requirements for Risk Management seminars, Short-term Leader seminars, and any other emerging requirements for short-term university programs. The link to the Student Travel and Education Abroad: Health and Safety policy is here:
http://www.policy.umn.edu/Policies/Education/Student/EDABROAD.html.

Assessing Programs

All CEHSP short-term programs should be assessed each time the program is offered. This assessment will take the form of a memo to CEHSP course department head and copy to the Dean outlining the following:

1. Number and demographics of participating students (e.g., majors, colleges)
2. Financial impact. What was the dollar profit or loss for the program?
3. Incidents. Report on any health, safety, academic or other misconduct incidents that occurred on the program and how these were handled.
4. Assessment of academic impact against program objectives.

This report should be submitted within 60 days of the end of the short-term program.

Revised for CEHSP and approved by Academic Affairs Committee
April 8, 2016

Collegiate policy originally prepared by
L. Rochford, LSBE faculty
D. Li, LSBE faculty
L. Neys, UMD International Programs and Services
23 March 2015

Refer to section 250.223 of the UEA Collective Bargaining Agreement.
Click here to access a calculator that will determine, based on approved department contact hour limits, the amount of contact hour reduction or overload for student credit hour generation above the limit.

In the calculator,

• enter the appropriate department contact hour limit in cell B2.
• enter the estimated SCH generation in cell C28 or C33, depending on whether the faculty is tenure-track or contract.

Summer School Planning Timeline

**The policy for the cancellation of summer session courses has been revised as follows:

"UMD administration will provide faculty contract offers to UEA faculty in December. Exceptions to this will be made only in those cases where a summer course is added in spring semester. UMD administration expects that summer session courses will seldom be cancelled due to low enrollment. However, if a course is cancelled, the principal administrator will work with the faculty member and department head on an alternate work assignment. This work assignment might be another course which the faculty member has previously taught, or an alternate project. In any case, the time period for the alternate work assignment will be the same as the original contract assignment unless the faculty member agrees otherwise. The Vice Chancellor for Academic Administration will review all alternate work assignments. If an alternative assignment cannot be arranged, the faculty member will be paid for the cancelled class."

Please note the last sentence as an addition to the policy sent previously.

Dean's Office Travel Funds

Funds are available to support faculty presenting peer-reviewed scholarship at conferences or attending a conference in a leadership capacity (e.g., officer position, committee role). Tenure-track faculty may be awarded up to $1,000 per fiscal year. Tenured and Term faculty (50% appointment or greater) may be awarded up to $750. Be sure to indicate on funding request form additional funding sources (e.g., start-up, grants, etc.).

For fiscal years 2022 and 2023 (i.e., academic years 2021-22 and 2022-23), faculty attending a professional conference but not presenting or attending in a leadership capacity will be eligible for a partial travel award up to half the usual amount (i.e., $500 for tenure-track faculty; $375 for tenured and term faculty).

Complete the travel request form based on your CEHSP department/unit:

• Applied Human Sciences
• Communication Sciences and Disorders
• Education
• Psychology
• Social Work
• Other Units (Dean’s Wing, Advising, Accreditation, Children’s Place, Preschool at the Park, AILRC, BLELC)

Travel Policies and Resources

• Traveling on University Business (UM Policy) 
• U Travel Website - for travel and booking guidance
• Traveling Internationally? Complete required International Travel Registry
• International funding opportunities through the UMN Global Programs & Strategy Alliance
• GSA Website - estimate meals and incidental expenses
• Travel request instructions for CEHSP Department Heads and Department Staff

The UROP program description, application/proposal form, and details can be found here.

All CEHSP applications will be prioritized by a CEHSP committee of five who read all proposals and rate against the stated criteria (see criteria below).  The number of proposals funded depends on funds available for UMD. UROP funds are distributed by group meeting of UROP coordinators from all academic units.  Based on recent years, approximately 2/3 of the anticipated funds for a year will be awarded in the spring round for the following academic year.  When funding levels for the campus are firm, the remaining funds for the fiscal year are awarded in the fall round for the following spring semester.

A committee of five – one representative from each undergraduate department - will prioritize applications.  Committee members will not evaluate their own sponsored projects.  Evaluation will be based on the following criteria.

• Review of Relevant Literature (1-5 scale) (Has the context of the project been established?)
• Clarity of Goal/Research Hypothesis (1-5 scale) (Has the applicant demonstrated understanding of the project?)
• Methodology (1-5 scale) (Are the methods described appropriate to the goal/research hypothesis? Is the timeframe for completion reasonable?)
• Research Implications (1-5 scale) (How will results contribute to the field, or answer a problem/question?)
• Overall Quality of Proposal (1-5 scale) (e.g., format, grammar, spelling, punctuation, organization, adherence to 3-page limit guideline, etc.)

All UROP applications will be evaluated with the same criteria/scoring system and ranked according to their total score.